Did
Corona really misuse the loan granted by World Bank Association?
Chief
Justice Renato Corona is in the middle of controversy as Appendix 4 of World
Bank Aide Memoir which showed the alleged unjust use of the loan during his
term leaked.
The
World Bank loan called Judicial Reform Support Project (JRSP) was granted to the judiciary
branch of the Philippine government to fund projects that would speed up the
justice system and would enhance the institutional integrity. It became effective in 2003 with the loan
summing up to $21.9-million.
According
to WB memoir an amount of US$199,900 of the loan was used for
plane fares, dinners and hotel expenses during Corona’s term instead of using
it for judiciary reforms.
On March 18, 2011, Chief Justice Renato
Corona and other Supreme Court officials went to the University of Cebu. The
aide memoire said it appears that plane fares for some court officials were
taken from the loan.
The World Bank is also questioning the
travel allowance of two court officials, which reached P170,000 each for a
three-day trip to Sydney, Australia.
These are aside from lavish room
accommodations and dinners shouldered by the Supreme Court. One of the said
dinners was given to the members of the judiciary of Guam and their Philippine
counterparts. Early last year, CJ Corona
played host to his Guam counterpart, the Honorable Robert J. Torres Jr.
World Bank rejected the charging of
“extra expenses” and demanded reimbursement because these were not in line with
the justice project.
Corona
vehemently denied the allegation. “This
happened before I became Chief Justice. I was not responsible for this. This
happened a decade ago and I have been Chief Justice for just a year and a
half.”
However, Department of Budget and
Management Secretary Butch Abad sees the 97 pages of documents prepared by the
WB showed that the questionable diversion of funds from the JRSP only took
place the previous year. Corona was
appointed chief justice of the Supreme Court in 2010.
"If you read the Annex 4 of the
report, it was very clear there that the gross irregularities happened in 2010
and 2011," Abad said.
Abad also added, "The loan was
negotiated sometime in 2003. Then it was implemented. What was startling is the
finding that the mid-2010 up to 2011 [period] when they observed escalating use
of funds and accompanying this was irregular use of funds".
The Aide Memoire indicated that CJ
Corona knew about the review of the fund disbursement in the project. It was agreed that one of the catches under
the JRSP would be an Expenditure Review of the judiciary. The Review was to audit expenses since the
project was winding down.
Two of the Review findings of the WB Mission
further sanctioned Corona.
First, WB indicated that “while
unauthorized disbursements for plane fares, hotel and entertainment expenses
were charged, some key expenses that were a vital part of the justice project
remained unpaid. Continuing delays in payments, and in several cases outputs
have been delivered but billings appear to be incomplete. And there are
activities where amounts to be paid to vendors are still unclear and issues
have remained open for more than a year.”
Among the unpaid expenses the Aide
Memoire mentioned were the previous works contract for the Angeles City Hall of
Justice. It is estimated to be between
P16-21 million.
Second, the funds are not directed to
where it is supposed to be. According to a statement in the Aide Memoire’s
“Fiduciary Reveiw”:
The PMO
(Supreme Court Program Management Office) has developed a practice of
‘borrowing’ funds from the designated account to overcome reported dealys in
naitonal budget cash releases even after receipt of the Notice of Cash
Allocation (NCA) from the DBM (Department of Budget and Management. Funds were
‘borrowed’ to finance expenditures unrelated to the JRSP (e.g. “goodwill
Games”, foreign travel, award of honorary degrees to foreign judges, etc.) and
later – when such expenditures were questioned by the Bank – re-deposited to
the Special Account (for the justice project).
In other words, Aide Memoire’s review shows that SC is merely borrowing the fund of the project to pay for non-related project expenses.
0 (mga) komento:
Mag-post ng isang Komento